REFERENCES
1. Seifrid, M.; Pollice, R.; Aguilar-Granda, A.; et al. Autonomous chemical experiments: challenges and perspectives on establishing a self-driving lab. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 2454-66.
2. Tom, G.; Schmid, S. P.; Baird, S. G.; et al. Self-driving laboratories for chemistry and materials science. Chem. Rev. 2024, 124, 9633-732.
3. Szymanski, N. J.; Rendy, B.; Fei, Y.; et al. An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of inorganic materials. Nature 2023, 624, 86-91.
4. M Bran, A.; Cox, S.; Schilter, O.; Baldassari, C.; White, A. D.; Schwaller, P. Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2024, 6, 525-35.
5. Boiko, D. A.; Macknight, R.; Kline, B.; Gomes, G. Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature 2023, 624, 570-8.
6. Dai, T.; Vijayakrishnan, S.; Szczypiński, F. T.; et al. Autonomous mobile robots for exploratory synthetic chemistry. Nature 2024, 635, 890-7.
7. Zhang, Z.; Ren, Z.; Hsu, C. W.; et al. A multimodal robotic platform for multi-element electrocatalyst discovery. Nature 2025, 647, 390-6.
8. Chen, X.; Sun, Y. L.; Lin, X. M.; Dong, J. C.; Li, J. F. In situ studies of electrochemical energy conversion and storage technologies: from materials, intermediates, and products to surroundings. Nanomicro. Lett. 2026, 18, 170.
9. Prajapati, A.; Hahn, C.; Weidinger, I. M.; et al. Best practices for in-situ and operando techniques within electrocatalytic systems. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2593.
10. Ning, M.; Wang, S.; Wan, J.; et al. Dynamic active sites in electrocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2024, 63, e202415794.
11. Ehelebe, K.; Schmitt, N.; Sievers, G.; et al. Benchmarking fuel cell electrocatalysts using gas diffusion electrodes: inter-lab comparison and best practices. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2022, 7, 816-26.
12. Zlatar, M.; Escalera-López, D.; Rodríguez, M. G.; et al. Standardizing OER electrocatalyst benchmarking in aqueous electrolytes: comprehensive guidelines for accelerated stress tests and backing electrodes. ACS. Catal. 2023, 13, 15375-92.
13. Pablo-García, S. García, Á.; Akkoc, G. D.; et al. An affordable platform for automated synthesis and electrochemical characterization. Device 2025, 3, 100567.
14. Sheng, H.; Sun, J.; Rodríguez, O.; et al. Autonomous closed-loop mechanistic investigation of molecular electrochemistry via automation. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2781.
15. Pyzer-Knapp, E. O.; Pitera, J. W.; Staar, P. W. J.; et al. Accelerating materials discovery using artificial intelligence, high performance computing and robotics. npj. Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 84.
16. Kirklin, S.; Saal, J. E.; Meredig, B.; et al. The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies. npj. Comput. Mater. 2015, 1, 15010.
17. Agrawal, A.; Choudhary, A. Perspective: materials informatics and big data: realization of the “fourth paradigm” of science in materials science. APL. Mater. 2016, 4, 053208.
18. Butler, K. T.; Davies, D. W.; Cartwright, H.; Isayev, O.; Walsh, A. Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 2018, 559, 547-55.
19. Song, T.; Luo, M.; Zhang, X.; et al. A multiagent-driven robotic AI chemist enabling autonomous chemical research on demand. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 12534-45.
20. Zhang, D.; Jia, X.; Liu, H.; et al. Cloud synthesis: a global closed-loop feedback powered by autonomous AI-driven catalyst design agent. AI. Agent. 2025, 1, 2.
21. Zhang, D.; Chen, Y.; Liu, C.; et al. Accelerating catalyst materials discovery with large artificial intelligence models. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2026, 65, e26150.
22. Burger, B.; Maffettone, P. M.; Gusev, V. V.; et al. A mobile robotic chemist. Nature 2020, 583, 237-41.
23. Lei, Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Automatic discovery and optimal generation of amorphous high-entropy electrocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 21743-53.
24. Yang, R.; Zhou, D.; Jia, Z.; et al. Toward practical design of high‐entropy catalysts for chlorine evolution reaction via Pareto‐guided multi‐objective Bayesian optimization enabled by a robotic AI‐chemist. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2026, 65, e8794274.
25. Yao, Y.; Dong, Q.; Brozena, A.; et al. High-entropy nanoparticles: synthesis-structure-property relationships and data-driven discovery. Science 2022, 376, eabn3103.
26. Pan, Y.; Shan, X.; Cai, F.; Gao, H.; Xu, J.; Zhou, M. Accelerating the discovery of oxygen reduction electrocatalysts: high‐throughput screening of element combinations in pt‐based high‐entropy alloys. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2024, 63, e202407116.
27. Shan, X.; Pan, Y.; Cai, F.; et al. Accelerating the discovery of efficient high-entropy alloy electrocatalysts: high-throughput experimentation and data-driven strategies. Nano. Lett. 2024, 24, 11632-40.
28. Kraushofer, F.; Parkinson, G. S. Single-atom catalysis: insights from model systems. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 14911-39.
29. Zhu, Q.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, D.; et al. Automated synthesis of oxygen-producing catalysts from Martian meteorites by a robotic AI chemist. Nat. Synth. 2023, 3, 319-28.
30. Shan, X.; Cai, F.; Tu, Y.; et al. Unveiling the correlation between high-entropy alloy element systems and electrocatalytic activity. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2026, 13, nwag161.
31. Dong, Q.; Yao, Y.; Cheng, S.; et al. Programmable heating and quenching for efficient thermochemical synthesis. Nature 2022, 605, 470-6.
32. Tu, Y.; Shan, X.; Chen, L.; et al. Accelerated discovery of highly stable ruthenium-based high-entropy oxides for acidic oxygen evolution. Sci. Adv. 2026, 12, eaed8479.
33. Priamushko, T.; Franz, E.; Logar, A.; et al. Be aware of transient dissolution processes in Co3O4 acidic oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 3517-28.
34. Sim, M.; Vakili, M. G.; Strieth-Kalthoff, F.; et al. ChemOS 2.0: an orchestration architecture for chemical self-driving laboratories. Matter 2024, 7, 2959-77.
35. Yao, Y.; Huang, Z.; Li, T.; et al. High-throughput, combinatorial synthesis of multimetallic nanoclusters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020, 117, 6316-22.
36. Zhu, Q.; Zhang, F.; Huang, Y.; et al. An all-round AI-Chemist with a scientific mind. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2022, 9, nwac190.
37. Zhang, X.; Gao, H.; Xu, J.; Zhou, M. Polyelectrolyte-functionalized carbon nanocones enable rapid and accurate analysis of Ag nanoparticle colloids. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2025, 36, 110148.
38. Santana Santos, C.; Jaato, B. N.; Sanjuán, I.; Schuhmann, W.; Andronescu, C. Operando scanning electrochemical probe microscopy during electrocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 4972-5019.
39. Clarke, T. B.; Krushinski, L. E.; Vannoy, K. J.; et al. Single entity electrocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2024, 124, 9015-80.
40. Anantharaj, S.; Kundu, S. Do the Evaluation parameters reflect intrinsic activity of electrocatalysts in electrochemical water splitting? ACS. Energy. Lett. 2019, 4, 1260-4.
41. Anantharaj, S.; Noda, S.; Driess, M.; Menezes, P. W. The pitfalls of using potentiodynamic polarization curves for tafel analysis in electrocatalytic water splitting. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2021, 6, 1607-11.
42. Luo, M.; Koper, M. T. M. A kinetic descriptor for the electrolyte effect on the oxygen reduction kinetics on Pt(111). Nat. Catal. 2022, 5, 615-23.
43. Gao, H.; Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, M. Benchmarking the Intrinsic Activity of Transition Metal Oxides for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction with Advanced Nanoelectrodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2024, 63, e202404663.
44. Liang, Z.; Ahn, H. S.; Bard, A. J. A study of the mechanism of the hydrogen evolution reaction on nickel by surface interrogation scanning electrochemical microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4854-8.
45. Huang, J.; Wang, Z.; Liang, J.; et al. Accelerating the pace of oxygen evolution reaction catalyst discovery through megalibraries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 30956-66.
46. Dix, S. T.; Lu, S.; Linic, S. Critical practices in rigorously assessing the inherent activity of nanoparticle electrocatalysts. ACS. Catal. 2020, 10, 10735-41.
47. Chen, W.; Feng, L.; Ma, B.; et al. Click-locking strategy enables automated synthesis of single-atom catalysts with industrial compatibility. Nat. Synth. 2026, 5, 935-47.
48. Hong, R.; Xing, L.; Wang, N.; Meng, L.; Du, L.; Ye, S. Ionomers: behind-the-scenes influencer determining the performance of membrane electrode assemblies in PEM fuel cells/electrolyzers. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2026, 11, 1193-207.
49. Yanagi, R.; Yang, P.; Tricker, A. W.; et al. Enhancing water and oxygen transport through electrode engineering for AEM water electrolyzers. Joule 2025, 9, 102001.
50. Fowler, D.; Gurau, V.; Cox, D. Bridging the gap between automated manufacturing of fuel cell components and robotic assembly of fuel cell stacks. Energies 2019, 12, 3604.
51. Shi, W.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; et al. Roll-to-roll synthesis of multielement heterostructured catalysts. Nat. Synth. 2025, 4, 836-47.
52. Du, P.; Deng, B.; He, X.; et al. Roll-to-roll flash joule heating to stabilize electrocatalysts onto meter-scale Ni foam for advanced water splitting. ACS. Nano. 2024, 19, 1327-39.
53. Shi, X.; Gong, Y.; Wang, Z.; et al. Liquid metal‐enabled rapid structure ordering of intermetallic nanocrystals with electronic modulation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 36, e25452.
