REFERENCES
1. Zhao, Z. J.; Liu, S.; Zha, S.; et al. Theory-guided design of catalytic materials using scaling relationships and reactivity descriptors. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 792-804.
2. Nørskov, J. K.; Bligaard, T.; Rossmeisl, J.; Christensen, C. H. Towards the computational design of solid catalysts. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 37-46.
3. Tao, F.; Salmeron, M. Surface restructuring and predictive design of heterogeneous catalysts. Science 2024, 386, eadq0102.
4. Zheng, S.; Zhang, X. M.; Liu, H. S.; et al. Active phase discovery in heterogeneous catalysis via topology-guided sampling and machine learning. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2542.
5. Qu, M. R.; Liu, H.; Feng, S. H.; et al. Temperature-dependent mechanism evolution on RhRu3Ox for acidic water oxidation. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 9261.
6. Lu, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Miao, M.; Ma, Y. Self-assembled ultrathin nanotubes on diamond (100) surface. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3666.
7. Wang, Q.; Oganov, A. R.; Zhu, Q.; Zhou, X. F. New reconstructions of the (110) surface of rutile TiO2 predicted by an evolutionary method. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 266101.
8. Bunting, R. J.; Cheng, X.; Thompson, J.; Hu, P. Amorphous surface PdOX and its activity toward methane combustion. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 10317-23.
9. Amirbeigiarab, R.; Tian, J.; Herzog, A.; et al. Atomic-scale surface restructuring of copper electrodes under CO2 electroreduction conditions. Nat. Catal. 2023, 6, 837-46.
10. Xu, L.; Papanikolaou, K. G.; Lechner, B. A. J.; et al. Formation of active sites on transition metals through reaction-driven migration of surface atoms. Science 2023, 380, 70-6.
11. Ma, X.; Yang, T.; He, D.; et al. Carbonate shell regulates CuO surface reconstruction for enhanced CO2 electroreduction. Nat. Synth. 2025, 4, 53-66.
12. Zhang, S.; Shan, J.; Zhu, Y.; et al. WGS catalysis and in situ studies of CoO1-x, PtCon/Co3O4, and PtmCom’/CoO1-x nanorod catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8283-93.
13. Frey, H.; Beck, A.; Huang, X.; van Bokhoven, J. A.; Willinger, M. G. Dynamic interplay between metal nanoparticles and oxide support under redox conditions. Science 2022, 376, 982-7.
14. Dai, W.; Wan, K.; Pang, K.; et al. In-depth understanding and precise modulation of surface reconstruction during heterogeneous electrocatalysis: from model to practical catalyst. Chem 2025, 11, 102345.
15. Li, X. Y.; Ou, P.; Duan, X.; et al. Dynamic active sites in situ formed in metal nanoparticle reshaping under reaction conditions. JACS Au 2024, 4, 1892-900.
16. Li, X. Y.; Zhu, B.; Gao, Y. Exploration of dynamic structure-activity relationship of a platinum nanoparticle in the CO oxidation reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021, 125, 19756-62.
17. Van Speybroeck, V. Challenges in modelling dynamic processes in realistic nanostructured materials at operating conditions. Philos. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2023, 381, 20220239.
18. Perego, S.; Bonati, L. Data efficient machine learning potentials for modeling catalytic reactivity via active learning and enhanced sampling. npj Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 291.
19. Yang, J.; Ye, K.; Xie, S.; et al. Diffusion model-guided inverse design of bimetallic catalysts for ammonia decomposition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026, 148, 537-46.
20. Zheng, Y.; Li, Z.; Song, Z. A generative machine learning model for the 3D reconstruction of material microstructure and performance evaluation. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2024, 430, 117224.
21. Park, H.; Onwuli, A.; Walsh, A. Exploration of crystal chemical space using text-guided generative artificial intelligence. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 4379.
22. Yang, C.; Wang, L.; Zhu, J.; Ou, P. Heterogeneous catalyst design by generative models. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 46.
23. Ridwan, O. G.; Pitié, S.; Raj, M. S.; et al. AI-assisted rapid crystal structure generation towards a target local environment. npj Comput. Mater. 2026, 12, 64.
24. Mortazavi, B. Recent advances in machine learning‐assisted multiscale design of energy materials. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2025, 15, 2403876.
25. Lian, Z.; Dattila, F.; López, N. Stability and lifetime of diffusion-trapped oxygen in oxide-derived copper CO2 reduction electrocatalysts. Nat. Catal. 2024, 7, 401-11.
26. Park, H.; Li, Z.; Walsh, A. Has generative artificial intelligence solved inverse materials design? Matter 2024, 7, 2355-67.
27. Takahara, I.; Mizoguchi, T.; Liu, B. Accelerated inorganic materials design with generative AI agents. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2025, 6, 103019.
28. De Breuck, P. P.; Wang, H. C.; Rignanese, G. M.; Botti, S.; Marques, M. A. L. Generative AI for crystal structures: a review. npj Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 370.
29. Yoon, A.; Bai, L.; Yang, F.; et al. Revealing catalyst restructuring and composition during nitrate electroreduction through correlated operando microscopy and spectroscopy. Nat. Mater. 2025, 24, 762-9.
30. Kok, J.; Albertini, P. P.; Leemans, J.; Buonsanti, R.; Burdyny, T. Overcoming copper stability challenges in CO2 electrolysis. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2025, 10, 550-63.
31. Vavra, J.; Ramona, G. P. L.; Dattila, F.; et al. Solution-based Cu+ transient species mediate the reconstruction of copper electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction. Nat. Catal. 2024, 7, 89-97.
32. Shi, X.; Lin, X.; Luo, R.; et al. Dynamics of heterogeneous catalytic processes at operando conditions. JACS Au 2021, 1, 2100-20.
33. Avanesian, T.; Dai, S.; Kale, M. J.; Graham, G. W.; Pan, X.; Christopher, P. Quantitative and atomic-scale view of CO-induced Pt nanoparticle surface reconstruction at saturation coverage via DFT calculations coupled with in situ TEM and IR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4551-8.
34. Wang, H. Y.; Chen, J. L.; Qi, X. Z.; et al. Operando cluster catalysis via coupled surface-subsurface dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 42972-83.
35. Luo, X.; Wang, Z.; Gao, P.; et al. Deep learning generative model for crystal structure prediction. npj Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 254.
36. Zhang, D.; Chen, Y.; Liu, C.; et al. Accelerating catalyst materials discovery with large artificial intelligence models. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2026, 65, e26150.
37. Ang, S. J.; Wang, W.; Schwalbe-Koda, D.; Axelrod, S.; Gómez-Bombarelli, R. Active learning accelerates ab initio molecular dynamics on reactive energy surfaces. Chem 2021, 7, 738-51.
38. Hoogeboom, E.; Satorras, V. G.; Vignac, C.; Welling, M. Equivariant diffusion for molecule generation in 3D. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning; PMLR, 2022; Vol. 162, pp. 8867-87. Available online: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/hoogeboom22a.html. (accessed 11 September 2026).
39. Klipfel, A.; Fregier, Y.; Sayede, A.; Bouraoui, Z. Vector field oriented diffusion model for crystal material generation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024; pp. 22193-201.
40. Rønne, N.; Aspuru-Guzik, A.; Hammer, B. Generative diffusion model for surface structure discovery. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 110, 235427.
41. Bengio, Y.; Lahlou, S.; Deleu, T.; Hu, E. J.; Tiwari, M.; Bengio, E. GFlowNet foundations. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023, 24, 1-55. Available online: https://jmlr.org/papers/v24/22-0364.html (accessed 11 September 2026).
42. Hernandez-Garcia, A.; Duval, A.; Volokhova, A.; et al. Crystal-GFN: sampling crystals with desirable properties and constraints. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2310.04925. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.04925 (accessed 11 September 2026).
43. Noé, F.; Olsson, S.; Köhler, J.; Wu, H. Boltzmann generators: sampling equilibrium states of many-body systems with deep learning. Science 2019, 365, eaaw1147.
44. Crehuet, R.; Buigues, P. J.; Salvatella, X.; Lindorff-Larsen, K. Bayesian-maximum-entropy reweighting of IDP ensembles based on NMR chemical shifts. Entropy 2019, 21, 898.
45. Stöckelmaier, J.; Oostenbrink, C. Combining simulations and experiments - a perspective on maximum entropy methods. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2025, 27, 14704-17.
46. Zeni, C.; Pinsler, R.; Zügner, D.; et al. A generative model for inorganic materials design. Nature 2025, 639, 624-32.
47. Chen, J. L.; Jiang, X. C.; Feng, L.; et al. Collectivity effect in cluster catalysis under operational conditions. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 9144.
48. Chee, S. W.; Lunkenbein, T.; Schlögl, R.; Roldán Cuenya, B. Operando electron microscopy of catalysts: the missing cornerstone in heterogeneous catalysis research? Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 13374-418.
49. Szymanski, N. J.; Bartel, C. J. Establishing baselines for generative discovery of inorganic crystals. Mater. Horiz. 2025, 12, 8000-11.
50. Henkelman, G.; Uberuaga, B. P.; Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 9901-4.
51. Newton, M. A. Dynamic adsorbate/reaction induced structural change of supported metal nanoparticles: heterogeneous catalysis and beyond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 2644-57.
52. Duan, M.; Yu, J.; Meng, J.; Zhu, B.; Wang, Y.; Gao, Y. Reconstruction of supported metal nanoparticles in reaction conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018, 57, 6464-9.
