REFERENCES
1. Wilk-Jakubowski, J. L.; Kuchcinski, A.; Wilk-Jakubowski, G. K.; Palej, A.; Pawlik, L. Digital technologies and machine learning in environmental hazard monitoring: a synthesis of evidence for floods, air pollution, earthquakes, and fires. Sensors 2026, 26, 893.
2. Lin, M.; Xu, Y.; Peng, J.; et al. From passive prevention to proactive intervention: an AI-assisted integrated governance system for algal bloom monitoring and control. Environ. Res. 2026, 289, 123379.
3. Topol, E. J. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 44-56.
4. Esteva, A.; Robicquet, A.; Ramsundar, B.; et al. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 24-9.
5. Shaw, K.A.; Williams, S.; Patrick, M. E.; et al. Prevalence and early identification of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 4 and 8 years - autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 16 sites, United States, 2022. MMWR. Surveill. Summ. 2025, 74, 1-22.
6. Bhattacharya, B.; Toor, D.; Chatterjee, M. Connecting the dots: environmental pollution and Autism Spectrum Disorder. Rev. Environ. Health. 2025, 40, 602-15.
7. Ma, Y.; Li, D.; Cui, F.; et al. Exposure to air pollutants and myocardial infarction incidence: a UK Biobank study exploring gene-environment interaction. Environ. Health. Perspect. 2024, 132, 107002.
8. Lee, T. H. Y.; Li, C.; Dos Santos, M. M.; et al. Assessment of emerging and persistent contaminants in an anthropogenic-impacted watershed: application using targeted, non-targeted, and in vitro bioassay techniques. Chemosphere 2024, 364, 143067.
9. Vitale, G. A.; Xia, S. N.; Dührkop, K.; et al. Enhancing tandem mass spectrometry-based metabolite annotation with online chemical labeling. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 6911.
10. Basu, B.; Alam, M. S.; Ghosh, B.; Gill, L.; Mcnabola, A. Mcnabola, A. Augmenting limited background monitoring data for improved performance in land use regression modelling: using support vector regression and mobile monitoring. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 201, 310-22.
11. Ryu, H.; Choi, Y. H.; Kim, E.; et al. Misclassification and characterization of exposure to humidifier disinfectants using a questionnaire. BMC. Public. Health. 2021, 21, 1458.
12. Bradman, A.; Kogut, K.; Eisen, E. A.; et al. Variability of organophosphorous pesticide metabolite levels in spot and 24-hr urine samples collected from young children during 1 week. Environ. Health. Perspect. 2013, 121, 118-24.
13. Pati, A. K.; Tripathy, A. R.; Subudhi, S. Intelligence frameworks for environmental pollution assessment: a review on air and water quality monitoring systems. Measurement 2026, 258, 119122.
14. O’Sharkey, K.; Mitra, S.; Chow, T.; et al. Air pollution and autism spectrum disorder: unveiling multipollutant risks and sociodemographic influences in California. Environ. Health. Perspect. 2025, 133, 067010.
15. Swaminathan, S.; Park, N.; Soares, E. A.; Brazil, E. A. V. From descriptions to chemical hazards: predicting persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity from natural language using LLMs. In Book of Abstracts, ML4PS Workshop at NeurIPS 2025, San Diego, CA, December 2025; Paper No. 225. https://ml4physicalsciences.github.io/2025/files/NeurIPS_ML4PS_2025_225.pdf (accessed 2026-08-10).
16. Qiang, H.; Wang, F.; Lu, W.; et al. Language model-guided anticipation and discovery of mammalian metabolites. Nature 2026, 651, 211-20.
17. Esu, C. O.; Pyo, J.; Cho, K. Machine learning-derived dose-response relationships considering interactions in mixtures: Applications to the oxidative potential of particulate matter. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 475, 134864.
18. Galatro, D.; Di Nardo, A.; Pai, V.; et al. Considerations for using tree-based machine learning to assess causation between demographic and environmental risk factors and health outcomes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2024, 31, 60927-35.
19. Naito, T.; Inoue, K.; Namba, S.; et al. ; BioBank Japan. Machine learning reveals heterogeneous associations between environmental factors and cardiometabolic diseases across polygenic risk scores. Commun. Med. 2024, 4, 181.
20. Chatterjee, A.; Woodruff, H.; Wu, G.; Lambin, P. Limitations of only reporting the odds ratio in the age of precision medicine: a deterministic simulation study. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 640854.
21. Zhang, L.; He, W.; Huang, P.; Zhong, L. A risk prediction model for autism spectrum disorder integrating biopsychosocial factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis with multicenter validation. Transl. Pediatr. 2025, 14, 3219-30.
22. Nam, J. W.; Choi, E. Y.; Ailshire, J. A.; Chiang, Y. Y. Unveiling population heterogeneity in health risks posed by environmental hazards using regression-guided neural network. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 24483.
23. Cortese, S.; Bellato, A.; Gabellone, A.; et al. Latest clinical frontiers related to autism diagnostic strategies. Cell. Rep. Med. 2025, 6, 101916.
24. Brian, J. A.; Zwaigenbaum, L.; Ip, A. Standards of diagnostic assessment for autism spectrum disorder. Paediatr. Child. Health. 2019, 24, 444-60.
25. Grzadzinski, R.; Huerta, M.; Lord, C. DSM-5 and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs): an opportunity for identifying ASD subtypes. Mol. Autism. 2013, 4, 12.
26. Liu, W.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, D.; Deng, H.; Zou, X.; Li, M. Detecting children with autism spectrum disorder based on script-centric behavior understanding with emotional enhancement. Neurocomputing 2026, 670, 132434.
27. Kayış, H.; Çelik, M.; Gedizlioğlu, Ç.; et al. A new approach in autism diagnosis: evaluating natural interaction using point of view (POV) glasses. Asian. J. Psychiatr. 2026, 116, 104798.
28. Hu, C.; Thrasher, J.; Li, W.; et al. Speech pattern disorders in verbally fluent individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a machine learning analysis. Front. Neuroinform. 2025, 19, 1647194.
29. Aarthi, D.; Kannimuthu, S. MACAFNet transformer-based multi-atlas fusion framework for autism spectrum disorder classification using functional connectivity. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 20075.
30. Jiang, S.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; et al. Generic Diagramming Platform (GDP): a comprehensive database of high-quality biomedical graphics. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 2025, 53, D1670-6.
31. Wild, C. P. Complementing the genome with an “exposome”: the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer. Epidemiol. Biomarkers. Prev. 2005, 14, 1847-50.
32. Hu, H.; Liu, X.; Zheng, Y.; et al. Methodological challenges in spatial and contextual exposome-health studies. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 53, 827-46.
33. Ponzano, M.; Rotem, R. S.; Bellavia, A. Complex methods for complex data: key considerations for interpretable and actionable results in exposome research. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2025, 40, 1399-403.
34. Isola, S.; Murdaca, G.; Brunetto, S.; Zumbo, E.; Tonacci, A.; Gangemi, S. The use of artificial intelligence to analyze the exposome in the development of chronic diseases: a review of the current literature. Informatics 2024, 11, 86.
35. Rajesh, M.; Babu, R. G.; Moorthy, U.; Easwaramoorthy, S. V. Machine learning-driven framework for realtime air quality assessment and predictive environmental health risk mapping. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 28801.
36. Cox, L. A. Jr. Implications of nonlinearity, confounding, and interactions for estimating exposure concentration-response functions in quantitative risk analysis. Environ. Res. 2020, 187, 109638.
37. Gianquintieri, L.; Oxoli, D.; Caiani, E. G.; Brovelli, M. A. State-of-art in modelling particulate matter (PM) concentration: a scoping review of aims and methods. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2025, 27, 25889-911.
38. Guo, F.; Chang, Y.; Zhang, J.; et al. Predicting gestational hypertension risk in high-density cities: a time-weighted heat-humidity exposure and built environment analysis using XGBoost in Shanghai. IEEE. Access. 2025, 13, 194197-211.
39. Rao, L.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Q.; et al. A GRU-based framework for air quality forecasting and spatiotemporal visual analytics. In Proceedings of the 2025 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Management Technology (ICCSMT '25), ACM, 2026; pp 121-6.
40. Kheder, A.; Toropainen, H.; Peng, W.; et al. TopoFlow: topography-aware pollutant Flow learning for high-resolution air quality prediction. npj. Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2026, 9, 143.
41. Xu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Xu, W.; Yang, Z.; Ting, K. M. A large language model for deriving spectral embeddings for accurate compound identification in mass spectrometry. Commun. Chem. 2025, 8, 326.
42. Sillé, F. C. M.; Prasse, C.; Luechtefeld, T.; Hartung, T. AI redefines mass spectrometry chemicals identification: retention time prediction in metabolomics and for a Human Exposome Project. Front. Public. Health. 2025, 13, 1687056.
43. Iyer, H. S.; Karasaki, S.; Yi, L.; Hswen, Y.; James, P.; Vopham, T. Harnessing geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI) for environmental epidemiology: a narrative review. Curr. Environ. Health. Rep. 2025, 12, 34.
44. Konstantinou, G. N.; Anderson, W. C. 3rd; Bagkis, E.; et al. Artificial intelligence-driven wearable and connected technology for allergy: real-time monitoring and predictive management for personalized care. J. Allergy. Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2025, 13, 2903-13.e2.
45. Ren, X.; Mi, Z.; Georgopoulos, P. G. Socioexposomics of COVID-19 across New Jersey: a comparison of geostatistical and machine learning approaches. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2024, 34, 197-207.
46. Johnson, T. DigitalExposome: A dataset for wellbeing classification using environmental air quality and human physiological data. Data. Brief. 2025, 59, 111442.
47. Johnson, T.; Kanjo, E.; Woodward, K. DigitalExposome: quantifying impact of urban environment on wellbeing using sensor fusion and deep learning. Comput. Urban. Sci. 2023, 3, 14.
48. Ibáñez, A.; Duran-Aniotz, C.; Migeot, J.; et al. Computational whole-body-exposome models for global precision brain health. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 11078.
49. O’Sharkey, K.; Meng, Q.; Mitra, S.; et al. Associations between brake and tire wear-related PM2.5 metal components, particulate oxidative stress potential, and autism spectrum disorder in Southern California. Environ. Int. 2024, 185, 108573.
50. O’sharkey, K.; Mitra, S.; Chow, T.; et al. Prenatal exposure to criteria air pollution and traffic-related air toxics and risk of autism spectrum disorder: a population-based cohort study of California births (1990-2018). Environ. Int. 2025, 201, 109562.
51. O’Sharkey, K.; Chow, T.; Mitra, S.; et al. Exploring the link between grandmaternal air pollution exposure and Grandchild’s ASD risk: A multigenerational population-based study in California. Environ. Int. 2025, 200, 109526.
52. Wang, C.; Qi, Y.; Chen, Z. Explainable gated recurrent unit to explore the effect of co-exposure to multiple air pollutants and meteorological conditions on mental health outcomes. Environ. Int. 2023, 171, 107689.
53. Curtin, P.; Austin, C.; Curtin, A.; et al. ; (for the Emergent Dynamical Systems Group). Dynamical features in fetal and postnatal zinc-copper metabolic cycles predict the emergence of autism spectrum disorder. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaat1293.
54. Ling, W.; Zhao, G.; Wang, W.; et al. Metallomic profiling and natural copper isotopic signatures of childhood autism in serum and red blood cells. Chemosphere 2023, 330, 138700.
55. Hupatz, H.; Rahu, I.; Wang, W. C.; Peets, P.; Palm, E. H.; Kruve, A. Critical review on in silico methods for structural annotation of chemicals detected with LC/HRMS non-targeted screening. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2025, 417, 473-93.
56. Stienstra, C. M. K.; Nazdrajić, E.; Hopkins, W. S. From reverse phase chromatography to HILIC: graph transformers power method-independent machine learning of retention times. Anal. Chem. 2025, 97, 4461-72.
57. Vernocchi, P.; Marangelo, C.; Guerrera, S.; et al. Gut microbiota functional profiling in autism spectrum disorders: bacterial VOCs and related metabolic pathways acting as disease biomarkers and predictors. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1287350.
58. Cloutier, M.; Yu, C.; Talarico, R.; et al. Prenatal exposure to fine particulate matter components and autism risk in childhood. JAMA. Netw. Open. 2025, 8, e2538882.
59. Heo, S.; Afanasyeva, Y.; Trasande, L.; Bell, M. L. Ghassabian, A. Residential mobility in pregnancy and potential exposure misclassification of air pollution, temperature, and greenness. Environ. Epidemiol. 2023, 7, e273.
60. Gupta, N.; Srinivasan, S.; Gupta, M. Rethinking psychometric testing in autism: overcoming the challenges of comorbidity and diagnostic overshadowing. CNS. Spectr. 2025, 30, e19.
61. Lingham, S.; Perumal, T. L.; Lewis, R.; Rodrigues, S.; Mukherjee, M. 8406 Use of a local bespoke social communication difficulties (SCD) proforma instead of ADI-R in children less than 5 years to capture DSM-5 criteria from history. Arch. Dis. Child. 2025, 110, A380-2.
62. Parish-Morris, J. Viewing early diagnosis through a developmental lens - “Autistic, yet still a girl”. JAMA. Netw. Open. 2025, 8, e2525893.
63. Kulage, K. M.; Goldberg, J.; Usseglio, J.; Romero, D.; Bain, J. M.; Smaldone, A. M. How has DSM-5 affected autism diagnosis? A 5-year follow-up systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J. Autism. Dev. Disord. 2020, 50, 2102-27.
64. Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network Surveillance Year 2010 Principal Investigators. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 sites, United States, 2010. MMWR Surveill. Summ. 2014, 63, 1-21. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6302a1.htm (accessed on 10 August 2026).
65. Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Song, P.; et al. Diagnosis-informed neuro-subtyping reveals subgroups of autism spectrum disorder with reliable and distinct functional connectivity profiles. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2025, 141, 111452.
66. Li, X.; Xu, G.; Geng, G.; et al. Subtyping autism spectrum disorder with a population graph-based dual autoencoder: revealing two distinct biotypes. CNS. Neurosci. Ther. 2025, 31, e70675.
67. Li, J.; Zheng, W.; Fu, X.; et al. Individual deviation-based functional hypergraph for identifying subtypes of autism spectrum disorder. Brain. Sci. 2024, 14, 738.
68. Fan, X. R.; He, Y.; Wang, Y. S.; et al. Profiling brain morphology for autism spectrum disorder with two cross-culture large-scale consortia. Commun. Biol. 2025, 8, 1157.
69. Mohammadi, F.; Shahrokhi, H.; Asadzadeh, A.; Pirmoradi, S.; Moghtader, A.; Rezaei‐Hachesu, P. Artificial intelligence in autism spectrum disorder diagnosis: a scoping review of face, voice, and text analysis methods. Health. Sci. Rep. 2025, 8, e71476.
70. Malik, W.; Fahiem, M. A.; Khan, J.; Jung, Y.; Alturise, F. An adaptive transfer learning framework for multimodal autism spectrum disorder diagnosis. Life 2025, 15, 1524.
71. Jones, W.; Klaiman, C.; Richardson, S.; et al. Eye-tracking-based measurement of social visual engagement compared with expert clinical diagnosis of autism. JAMA 2023, 330, 854-65.
72. Rad, A. B.; Villavicencio, T.; Kiarashi, Y.; et al. From motion to emotion: exploring challenging behaviors in autism spectrum disorder through analysis of wearable physiology and movement. Physiol. Meas. 2025, 13, 015004.
73. Yu, L.; Liu, W.; Wang, X.; et al. A review of practical statistical methods used in epidemiological studies to estimate the health effects of multi-pollutant mixture. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 306, 119356.
74. Schwartz, J.; Feng, Y.; Castro, E.; Wei, Y. Causal concentration-response modeling with continuous curves and exposure error correction: PM2.5 and mortality in the medicare cohort. Environ. Health. Perspect. 2025, 133, 067007.
75. Tasioulis, T.; Bagkis, E.; Kassandros, T.; Karatzas, K. The quest for the best explanation: comparing models and XAI methods in air quality modeling tasks. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 7390.
76. Arif, S. Estimating causal effects with machine learning: a guide for ecologists. Methods. Ecol. Evol. 2025, 16, 2771-83.
77. Zhang, S.; Guo, J.; Qian, Y.; Mao, M.; An, D. AI-enabled mapping of structure-hazard relationships for emerging contaminants. Environ. Health. 2026, 4, 1251-62.
78. Cheng, F.; Li, Q.; He, L.; et al. Leveraging large language models for contextual prioritization of contaminants of emerging concern in chemical mixtures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2026, 60, 11380-91.
79. Do, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Lee, M. Neural network-based partial-linear single-index models for environmental mixtures analysis. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2512.11593. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11593 (accessed 21 July 2026).
80. Midya, V.; Alcala, C. S.; Rechtman, E.; et al. Machine learning assisted discovery of interactions between pesticides, phthalates, phenols, and trace elements in child neurodevelopment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 18139-50.
81. Rud, D.; Mostafijur Rahman, M.; Xiang, A. H.; et al. Frequentist grouped weighted quantile sum regression for correlated chemical mixtures. Stat. Med. 2025, 44, e70078.
82. Qi, L.; Yang, J.; Niu, Q.; Li, J. Exploring pesticide risk in autism via integrative machine learning and network toxicology. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 297, 118233.
83. Ellul, P.; Maruani, A.; Vantalon, V.; et al. Maternal immune activation during pregnancy is associated with more difficulties in socio-adaptive behaviors in autism spectrum disorder. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 17687.
84. Huang, Z.; Dong, K.; Lin, T.; Antonelli, J. Multivariate incremental effects for continuous treatments: studying the health effects of environmental mixtures. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2604.23534v1. Available online: https://arxiv.org/html/2604.23534v1 (accessed 21 July 2026).
85. Zhou, X.; Reich, B. J.; Yang, S. Spatial causal tensor completion for multiple exposures and outcomes: an application to the health effects of PFAS pollution. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2603.16854. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16854 (accessed 21 July 2026).
86. Khot, A.; Oprescu, M.; Schröder, M.; Kagawa, A.; Luo, X. Spatial Deconfounder: interference-aware deconfounding for spatial causal inference. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2510.08762. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08762 (accessed 21 July 2026).
87. Liu, X.; Qian, L.; Chen, S. X.; Tang, N. Partially Functional Dynamic Backdoor Diffusion-Based Causal Model. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2509.00472. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00472 (accessed 21 July 2026).
88. Herrera, R.; Berger, U.; Von Ehrenstein, O. S.; et al. Estimating the causal impact of proximity to gold and copper mines on respiratory diseases in chilean children: an application of targeted maximum likelihood estimation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 2017, 15, 39.
89. Yang, L.; Gao, C.; Qin, R.; Wu, Q.; Sun, H.; Zhang, T. Impact of e-waste pollutant exposure on renal injury and oxidative stress biomarkers: Evidence from causal machine learning. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 495, 138831.
90. Zhang, B.; Hart, J. E.; Laden, F.; et al. The association between PM2.5 components and cognitive decline: the impact of measurement error correction. Environ. Res. 2026, 301, 124533.
91. Doi, H.; Furui, A.; Ueda, R.; et al. Risk of autism spectrum disorder at 18 months of age is associated with prenatal level of polychlorinated biphenyls exposure in a Japanese birth cohort. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 31872.
92. Jacobson, L. P.; Parker, C. B.; Cella, D.; et al. Approaches to protocol standardization and data harmonization in the ECHO-wide cohort study. Pediatr. Res. 2024, 95, 1726-33.
93. Dai, S.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S. Evaluating the performance of large language models for one atmosphere using automated extracted datasets. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 60, 725-35.
94. Wilson, R.; Weets, C. M.; Rosner, A.; Katz, R. Evaluating generative artificial intelligence’s limitations in health policy identification and interpretation. PLoS. One. 2024, 19, e0312078.
95. Zhang, Y.; Lin, S.; Xiong, Y.; et al. Fine-tuning large language models for interdisciplinary environmental challenges. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 2025, 27, 100608.
96. Vimalapriya, M. D.; Mythili, R.; Poonguzhali, A.; Manikandan, G.; Alabdulatif, A.; Yasmin, J. H. J. A hierarchical privacy-preserving federated learning framework with differential privacy for collaborative healthcare diagnostics. SN. Comput. Sci. 2026, 7, 398.
