fig4

Comparison of extracellular vesicle isolation methods reveals method-dependent protein and miRNA profiles in saliva

Figure 4. Functional enrichment analysis of differentially abundant proteins between whole saliva and EV fractions. Bar plots illustrate the results of functional enrichment analyses performed using the ClusterProfiler R package (v4.10.1) on proteins differentially abundant between WS and each EV isolation method. (A, C and E) KEGG pathway enrichment for WS vs. UC, WS vs. Q, and WS vs. M, respectively; (B, D and F) GO enrichment analysis (CC category) for WS vs. UC, WS vs. Q, and WS vs. M, respectively. The x-axis indicates the number of proteins associated with each enriched pathway or CC, and the y-axis lists the top enriched terms. Bar color reflects the adjusted P-value (Benjamini-Hochberg), with redder colors indicating greater statistical significance. WS: Whole saliva supernatant; EV: extracellular vesicles; UC: ultracentrifugation; Q: PEG-based co-precipitation; M: immunoaffinity capture; KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; GO: Gene Ontology; BP: biological process; CC: cellular component.

Extracellular Vesicles and Circulating Nucleic Acids
ISSN 2767-6641 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/